|
|
|
first33123331 (zv42yjg2r8@naver.com ) (¿¬¶ôó : zv4479j477.com ) 12¿ù 31ÀÏ 20½Ã 08ºÐ Á¶È¸¼ö: 128 |
Who are England\'s best three seamers
¼öÁ¤
»èÁ¦
|
Who are England's best three seamers?
England at least managed to ·¹Çø®Ä«Áö°©=·¹Çø®Ä«Áö°© take 20 wickets for the first time in three matches this winter.
To do so, I still think their best chance CP company=CP company¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù will be a pace attack of James Anderson, Broad and Archer - despite Sam Curran's impressive 4-58 in the first innings this week.
England are protecting one or two players at the moment. All-rounder Ben Stokes does not bowl much these days - maybe a spell or ÆÄ¶óÁ¡ÆÛ½º=ÆÄ¶óÁ¡ÆÛ½º¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù two here and there - because of his knee, so Anderson, Broad and Archer are especially important.
Anderson, England's all-time leading wicket-taker, needed a run-out in Centurion after four months out with a calf injury, but England will Á÷¼ö³Ã¿ÂÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»=Çö´ëÅ¥¹Ö Å¥¹Ö ´õ ½½¸² ¸®´º¾ó Á÷¼ö³Ã¿ÂÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»ÂøÇѰ÷ also have to look at the lengths they bowled.
I do not think bowling bouncers with three men on the leg-side boundary - as they resorted to at Supersport Park - is the way to go.
Archer took 5-102 in the second innings ·¹Çø®Ä«½Å¹ß=·¹Çø®Ä«½Å¹ß but was expensive, conceding six runs an over. After an impressive start to his Test career in the Ashes this summer, England have not found the best use of him yet.
I would use Archer, England's quickest bowler, as a spearhead. If England are going to play five seamers as they did in this match, they can use Archer in bursts of three or four overs, so he can come back and bowl in an hour's time.
Spare him the long spells. Other bowlers can do that. |
|
|
¸ñ·ÏÀ¸·Î |
|
|