|
|
|
s2om3131e (zvr433412z@naver.com ) (¿¬¶ôó : zv114212zt7.com ) 12¿ù 31ÀÏ 21½Ã 25ºÐ Á¶È¸¼ö: 119 |
Football\'s law-makers say
¼öÁ¤
»èÁ¦
|
Football's law-makers say the video assistant referee system should not be "too forensic" when it comes to offsides - and should ¸íǰst=¸íǰst only be used to reverse "clear and obvious" errors.
Five goals in the Premier League were ruled out at the weekend for marginal offsides, leading some managers and players to criticise VAR.
Lukas Brud, general secretary ¿©ÀÚ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ®=¿©ÀÚ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ® of the International Football Association Board, said: "With VAR we see some things that are going in a direction that we may need to re-adjust."
He said the body would reissue guidance È«Äá¸íǰ°¡¹æ=È«Äá¸íǰ¿©¼º½Ã°è È«Äá¸íǰ°¡¹æ È«Äá¸íǰÁö°© on VAR's use after its annual general meeting in February.
"If you spend multiple minutes trying to identify whether it is offside or not, then it's not clear and obvious and the original decision should stand," he said.
He added: "What we really need to Çѻ½÷çÁ÷¼öÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»=¿õÁøÄÚ¿þÀÌ Çѻ ½Ã·çÁ÷¼ö Á¤¼ö±â·»Å» / CHP-8300R¹ÏÀ»¸¸ÇѰ÷ stress is that 'clear and obvious' applies to every single situation that is being reviewed by the VAR or the referee.
"In theory, 1mm ½Å¹ß·¹Çø®Ä«=½Å¹ß·¹Çø®Ä« offside is offside, but if a decision is taken that a player is not offside and the VAR is trying to identify through looking at five, six, seven, 10, 12 cameras whether or not it was offside, then the original decision should stand. |
|
|
¸ñ·ÏÀ¸·Î |
|
|